19 febr. Guinness World Record for Exorbitant Crown Cocktail is Shaken, Not Stirred, as Back Story Emerges
‘The Winston’ cocktail, made with 1858 vintage cognac by a celebrity mixologist at the Crown Melbourne, ended up being section of a bungled publicity stunt that cost the casino more than a drink.
The Crown Casino in Melbourne could be stripped of the Guinness World Record as a result of strange tale of a cheating Kiwi millionaire, a $32 million casino scam, a narrowly averted PR disaster, and the entire world’s most high-priced cocktail that is free.
The saga begins in September 2013, at the Crown Casino’s Club 23, a bar co-owned by Crown owner James Packer, famous retired cricketer Shane Warne, and former WSOP Main Event champ Joe Hachem.
Australian media and officials from the Guinness Book of reports had gathered to witness high-roller businessman Giang Nguyen imbibe the world’s most cocktail that is expensive.
‘The Churchill,’ was made with 1858-vintage Croizet Cuvee Leonie cognac, a way of measuring Chartreuse VEP Vert (a French liqueur that is herbal-infused by monks) and splash of Angostura Bitters, among other ridiculously expensive and somewhat odd components. The drink can be so named as they planned the D-Day landings during WWII because it was purportedly the beverage of choice for PM Winston Churchill and President Dwight Eisenhower.
Maybe Not A inexpensive Date
The high cost was AU$12,500, approximately US$9,500, hence all the hullabaloo and the guy from Guinness using the clipboard watch that is keeping.
But oddly, as present media made note, Nguyen looked uncomfortable, took one sip, declared it to be ‘good’ and hurried down to the evening, leaving about $8000-worth of vintage booze unsipped. Issue is the reason why.
Rewind to February of 2013. Crown announced via news release that New Zealand millionaire James Manning would be the guy to cough up five figures for the impossibly luxe new cocktail. Manning was in fact lured to Crown by a member of the VIP services staff, the department that’s faced with attracting and keeping whales that are high-rolling.
The plan was that Manning would come to Crown, gamble big and lose big, before obliging the casino by firmly taking part in their little publicity stunt. Just What could possibly make a mistake?
What Crown don’t understand was that Manning was a skilled cheat and card counter, and had employed someone on the within to signal information to him. Using a technique that the casino hasn’t fully elaborated upon, Manning took Crown for $32 million in just eight hands of blackjack.
‘We could not believe what he had won and some of the bets he placed were very, very dubious,’ A crown that is former executive the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘Those eight hands, in specific … he bet contrary to the chances and won, so one of our surveillance guys made a decision to have a better look.’
A better look revealed that Manning and their accomplice, the guy from the VIP department who had invited him in the first destination, no less, were in cahoots, operating a complex scam to cheat the casino.
Manning was immediately turned away from his room in the middle of the evening and banned for eternity from the property. While the vast majority regarding the money had not yet been settled, Crown opted for not to press costs, but it left the PR department in a bit of the pickle.
‘Having James Manning done for a gambling heist right before the big event had not been in the script,’ said a former member of crown’s PR team. ‘We had the cognac, we had the big event arranged, we just didn’t have a customer. We were in a awful bind.’
The facts are, then, that Nguyen was a shill, a buddy of the management, bussed in at the final moment. The promotion stunt had been all for show therefore the Crown would reimburse him the full amount the next morning.
Essentially, Nguyen got a drink of the world’s many expensive cocktail for free of Crown, in which he wasn’t also a top model or Mariah Carey.
Macau Revenues playpokiesfree.com Down Again, But Some See Signs Of Hope
Macau’s gaming industry continues to struggle, though analysts see some signs of a recovery. (Image: Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Graphics)
Macau’s gaming revenues are continuing their apparently endless tumble, falling again in June to create it 13 straight months of decrease for the Chinese enclave.
However, not all associated with news coming out of Macau had been harmful to the gambling enterprises, suggesting that although the current trends are painful, there may be hope on the horizon that things could improve in the not-too-distant future.
First, though, there is the bad news.
Macau’s Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau reported that gambling enterprises within the territory took within just $2.2 billion in gaming income in June, down 36 percent when compared with the period that is same year earlier.
This is the cheapest figure for Macau since November 2010.
Overall, annual gaming revenues are down about 37 percent in 2015 set alongside the first six months of final 12 months.
Incremental Improvement Provides Some Hope
Still, the June figures were somewhat much better than the projections of some analysts.
‘Although a 36 percent year-over-year decline is not even close to healthier, we find it encouraging the theme of modest sequential comparison improvement remains on trend,’ said video gaming analyst Steven Wieczynski of Stifel Nicolaus Capital Markets.
In other words, the fact that things have been slightly less terrible for Macau recently is a step into the right direction. There are also indications that profits could start to tick back up this summer, too.
Gaming revenues were actually up over the last nine days associated with the which could be related to the start of the summer tourism season month.
If those increases carry on into July, the yearly numbers could begin looking far better for Macau, especially considering that the final couple of months of 2014 were particularly brutal for the gambling enterprises there.
Relaxed Visitation Rules Could Encourage More Tourism
A bit in addition, the Chinese government finally seems to be stepping in to help Macau. As of Wednesday, visitation rules have actually been calm, and mainland Chinese residents can now see Macau twice each month instead than twice per every 60 day period. The maximum period of any one stay has also increased from five days to seven.
That choice caused many casino stocks to surge this week. Four of five casino stocks listed in Hong Kong saw their biggest gains into the previous four years, including MGM Asia, Wynn Macau, and Sands Asia.
Even though the specific effect with this decision is reasonably little, it might signal a change in policy from the mainland Chinese government, which hurt Macau’s gaming industry significantly with its anti-corruption policies that cut much of this cash flow towards the territory.
Analysts expect more supportive measures from China later on in 2015, and even if none of those modifications are dramatic, they are able to have positive cumulative effect.
Not all of the news taken from Macau is good. The Macau federal government is presenting a complete smoking ban in its legislature this week. That bill is apt to be passed later this year, and could be implemented when early next year.
On the basis of the impact that a ban on smoking in mass market casino areas had, analysts believe that this new ban, which may expand to more private gaming areas, could similarly harm spending by high rollers, with a few predicting a 10 to 15 percent reduction in revenues because regarding the smoking cigarettes prohibition.
Tennis Match Fixing Problems Consistently Make Headlines
Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but numerous say that the training is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller activities. (Image: Wikipedia)
Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of people to questions concerning the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players early in the day this year, there always appears to be something lurking beneath the game’s area.
Those concerns were aired again this in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and figure out just how much of a problem match fixing is for the sport week.
One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of all tournament that is first-round might be fixed, which will mean a lot more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have recommended that multiple matches each week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless an extremely tiny percentage of most professional tennis matches.
Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players
What makes tennis therefore vulnerable to complement fixing?
There are a variety of facets, lots of which help explain why the issue seems most prominent at the lower degrees of the ranks that are professional.
First, there’s the most obvious fact that tennis ( at least in singles play) is a specific sport.
There is one individual that needs to be bribed to be able to have them to throw a match (equivalent issue that leads many to worry widespread integrity dilemmas in boxing as well as other combat activities), and there are no teammates or substitutes to choose the slack up for a player who is struggling.
That stated, no body is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of repairing matches at Wimbledon.
For one, there is the fact these matches have an intense amount of scrutiny on them; maybe even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it would price anybody trying to fix a match at that level an exorbitant amount of money, if maybe it’s done at all.
That is not to say that nobody tries. Even Novak Djokovic has told a tale of being provided $100,000 to correct a match back in 2006.
But players regarding the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked rivals aren’t making nearly that much money, and may also lose cash in an offered competition after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.
That makes them targets that are prime gamblers looking to fix a match.
Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result
Another problem is the fact that gamblers don’t have to correct an entire match to find ways to profit.
Because many gambling sites and bookmakers offer betting on sets or games that are even individual players can reach agreements allowing certain events to take place at the proper times to fulfill gamblers while still playing to win overall.
‘One particular typical fix would be to separate the first couple of sets to a predetermined script, then play the third set fairly to ascertain which player progresses,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this 12 months.
The Tennis Integrity Unit is the human anatomy tasked with rooting out such issues, and they’ve often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though perhaps not for match-fixing.
But regardless of what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely to alter the culture that enables lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who wish to make bets that are sure.
That would demand a complete change in how compensation works down and up the different levels of professional tennis, something that most likely won’t happen any time soon.